[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] ubuntu, groff and utf-8
From: |
Colin Watson |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] ubuntu, groff and utf-8 |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:18:27 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:55:48PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > > .fchar \[la] <
> > > .fchar \[ra] >
> >
> > Could we do that for \[hy] and \[mi] too?
>
> Of course! Which entities do you suggest?
I was going to suggest simply Unicode HYPHEN-MINUS; I know you don't
like it typographically, but HYPHEN has a bad habit of being unavailable
in console fonts (and even a few common X fonts).
However, I've just read your mail saying that distributions should
instead change this to be in sync with the console fonts they expect to
be available, which is fair enough. When I saw you talking about
tty.tmac, I assumed that there was a way to make groff output different
mappings depending on whether it's been told that it's outputting to a
terminal or not. In retrospect, my thought processes didn't make a whole
lot of sense ...
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson address@hidden
Re: [Groff] ubuntu, groff and utf-8, Michail Vidiassov, 2005/03/08
- Re: [Groff] ubuntu, groff and utf-8, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/03/08
- Re: [Groff] ubuntu, groff and utf-8, Michail Vidiassov, 2005/03/08
- Re: [Groff] ubuntu, groff and utf-8, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/03/09
- Re: [Groff] ubuntu, groff and utf-8, Colin Watson, 2005/03/09
- Re: [Groff] ubuntu, groff and utf-8, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/03/09
- Re: [Groff] ubuntu, groff and utf-8,
Colin Watson <=
Re: [Groff] ubuntu, groff and utf-8, Andrey Borzenkov, 2005/03/12