[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] refer question
From: |
Jorgen Grahn |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] refer question |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:23:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sat Apr 2 10:29:34 2005, address@hidden wrote:
[I wrote]
> > MLA seems to be "Modern Language Association". What kind of
> > status (official or unofficial) does this style have? I have
> > never heard about it or seen it used.
...
> There are two major academic traditions to deal with bibliographic
> references - the Harvard system (or the Author/Date system) and the
> Oxford system (or the Footnote system).
>
> http://www.kangan.edu.au/library/tips/bibliographies.htm
>
> Since both systems are ofte described in within the same style guide, I
> think it is better to refer to "systems of references" rather than
> actual style guides. For example, both the Harvard and the Oxford system
> are escribed in Chicago Manual of Style.
I called the MLA system a "style", not a "style guide". I am aware that
style guides often describe several conflicting styles. The term "style"
seems widespread -- BibTeX uses it, for example.
BR,
Jörgen
--
// Jörgen Grahn "Koka lopplummer, bada Ross, loppor borta."
\X/ <address@hidden> -- Jonas
- Re: [Groff] refer question, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] refer question, Jorgen Grahn, 2005/04/01
- Re: [Groff] refer question, Peter Schaffter, 2005/04/01
- Re: [Groff] refer question, Ted Harding, 2005/04/01
- Re: [Groff] refer question, Peter Schaffter, 2005/04/01
- Re: [Groff] refer question, Jorgen Grahn, 2005/04/02
- Re: [Groff] refer question, Peter Schaffter, 2005/04/02
- Re: [Groff] refer question, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/04/04
RE: [Groff] refer question, Mats Broberg, 2005/04/02