[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start
From: |
Tadziu Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:51:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
> >> since a diversion isn't paginated until it is flushed out,
> >> how would we capture TOC entries, with proper page number
> >> references, while collecting the main body diversion?
> >
> > Simple: you create a temporary page diversion for collecting
> > text. When that is full, you increment your own page counter,
> > divert-append the page diversion to the body diversion, clear
> > the page diversion, and continue collecting more text in the
> > page diversion...
>
> Ok. I think I get the idea. Presumably you would use a diversion
> trap at the physical page length, less the header an footer margins,
> to detect when the page diversion is full? But would that not get
> horribly complicated, when considering the effect of footnote
> diversions and other types of keep.
>
> I guess, if implementing something like this, we wouldn't be using
> it in conjunction with the `ms' or `mm' macros.
Yes. One of the complications that comes to mind is that
in contrast to direct output to the "page" (the "top-level
diversion"), which supports an arbitrary number of "position
traps", any other diversion only supports a single "diversion
trap". So if your macro package makes extensive use of
position traps, I'd say you're in for some seriuos rewriting...
- Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start, Larry Kollar, 2005/09/29
- Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start, Larry Kollar, 2005/09/29
- Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start, Keith MARSHALL, 2005/09/29
- Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start, Keith MARSHALL, 2005/09/29
- Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start, Keith MARSHALL, 2005/09/29
- Re: [Groff] moving TOC to start, Keith MARSHALL, 2005/09/30