[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:49:28 +0100 (CET) |
> Bruno> U+27E8..27E9 are MATHEMATICAL LEFT/RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET and
> Bruno> were introduced in Unicode 3.2. The glyphs are very similar
> Bruno> (see http://www.unicode.org/charts/symbols.html under
> Bruno> "Misc. Math Symbols A" and "Miscellaneous Technical"). Why
> Bruno> prefer one over the other?
>
> FWIW, those two glyphs are from the Symbol font. devutf8 probably
> uses them because the ps device uses Symbol to display la and ra.
No, the reason is that U+2329 and U+232A are canonically identical to
U+3008 and U+3009, respectively, for historical reasons. Normally,
the latter two glyphs (which are in the CJK punctuation range) are
displayed as double-width characters.
Werner
- [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/13
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, James Cloos, 2006/02/13
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, James Cloos, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Pedro A . López-Valencia, 2006/02/16
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode,
Werner LEMBERG <=
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/14
[Groff] unicode support, part 10: \[shc], Bruno Haible, 2006/02/21