Re: [Groff] groff manpage typo

[Clarke Echols]

Great!  Do it.

Clarke

Keith MARSHALL wrote:
> Clarke Echols wrote:
> > > > maybe it could read, for instance:
> > > >
> > > > "Do not postprocess the output of troff (as is normally done 
> > > > automatically).  This will print ..."
> > > I favour this change of wording; it corrects the grammatical sense,
> > > while preserving the originally intended meaning...<snip>
> > How about:
> >
> > "Do not automatically postprocess troff output in the usual manner.
> > This will print..."
>
> Yes, I like that!  Perhaps also with the following sentence amended,
> so the whole paragraph becomes:
>
> "Do not automatically postprocess troff output in the usual manner.
> This will cause the intermediate output to appear on stdout; see
> groff_out(5)."
>
> Regards,
> Keith.