[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] misleading warning
From: |
Keith MARSHALL |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] misleading warning |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:37:02 +0100 |
>> s/probably/possibly/ would be better, IMHO.
>
> Fixed, thanks. Note that this wording is from James Clark...
Ah, well. He's English, so what would he know? :-)
Sorry, just couldn't resist the opportunity to return some of the
banter, which normally flows westward across the Irish Sea. I'm
sure James would agree that `possibly' is a better fit here, but
overlooked it, when he originally wrote `probably'.
Regards,
Keith.