[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff
From: |
Keith Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:15:22 +0100 |
On Sunday 02 July 2006 8:56 pm, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
[re: suppression of blank page elimination in pdfroff output]
> > `--no-kill-null-pages' option, which will allow this filter to be
> > explicitly disabled; (I've already begun to prepare this, and will
> > commit both patches together).
>
> This is much better idea.
> I should have done that in the first place.
> But that still requires keeping that script in a sort of a string
> variable the way my patch did it or using if-else statement with and
> without script which looked a little clumsy to me (so I opted for a
> string variable solution).
> I wonder how do you plan to do it?
By using a conditionally substituted shell variable, as in this commital:
2006-07-14 Keith Marshall
* pdfroff.sh (PDFWRITE): Local shell variable replaced...
(PDFROFF_POSTPROCESSOR_COMMAND): by this new environment
variable...
(GROFF_GHOSTSCRIPT_INTERPRETER): with this bound to it.
(PDFROFF_COLLATE, PDFROFF_KILL_NULL_PAGES): New environment
variables.
(--no-kill-null-pages): New command line option; implement it,
and...
(--help): Add description for it.
* pdfroff.man (PDFROFF_POSTPROCESSOR_COMMAND): Document it.
(PDFROFF_COLLATE, PDFROFF_KILL_NULL_PAGES): Document them.
(--no-kill-null-pages): Document it.
2006-07-14 Zvezdan Petkovic <address@hidden>
* pdfroff.sh (--emit-ps): New command line option; implement it.
(--help): Add description for it.
* pdfroff.man (--emit-ps): Document it.
> I also see in your latest patch the part
>
> exec > $PDF_OUTPUT
>
> Its obvious intention is to open the output file and redirect the later
> '-' (stdout) to it. Does this work with every Bourne type shell?
AFAIK, yes. However, I don't have many variants on which I can test, so
if you discover or know of a problem, please let me know.
This particular construct has been used elsewhere within pdfroff, and
also in our nroff script, for some time now, with no complaints to date.
Regards,
Keith.
- Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff,
Keith Marshall <=
- Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff, Keith Marshall, 2006/07/30
- Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff, Keith Marshall, 2006/07/30
- Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff, Keith MARSHALL, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff, Keith MARSHALL, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff, Keith MARSHALL, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Groff] patch for pdfroff, Keith MARSHALL, 2006/07/31