[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Choosing a portability target
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Choosing a portability target |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:28:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Robert Thorsby <address@hidden>:
> On 2007.01.11 12:06 Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> >The groff project -- and I'm not sure what that means,
> >other than "Werner Lemburg" -- is going to have to
> >decide how much portability it wants. There's a sort
> >of sliding scale of difficulty here.
>
> I have sat and watched this debate, which has sometimes become
> unnecessarily acrimonious, without intervening until now -- but I
> cannot hold my tongue any longer.
>
> I live in awe of the extraordinary work done by Werner, particularly
> when one considers that he holds down a "proper" job. But, Eric, your
> quoted remark is incorrect and insulting, and plain downright bitchy.
> You are acting like a spoiled child.
Huh?
You puzzle me exceedingly.
I don't know who the project leadership is, that's all. That's all
I meant -- I'm well aware there are other contributors. I have been
one of them myself occasionally.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- [Groff] Choosing a portability target, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/10
- Re: [Groff] Choosing a portability target, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/10
- Re: [Groff] Choosing a portability target, Robert Thorsby, 2007/01/10
- Re: [Groff] Choosing a portability target, Jon Snader, 2007/01/11
- Re: [Groff] Choosing a portability target, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/11
- Re: [Groff] Choosing a portability target, walter harms, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Groff] Choosing a portability target, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/01/12
- Re: [Groff] Choosing a portability target, walter harms, 2007/01/12