Re: [Groff] Strategy for fixing tbl

[Eric S. Raymond]

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
> This should be rather
> 
>   +    printfs("(u;\\n[%1]+(\\n[%2]/\\n[%3]))",
>   [...]
> 
> shouldn't it?

Arrggh.  Yes, that's just about the kind of simple troff error
I was expecting I had made...

I'll test tonight.  Interface question: do you want this to become the
new default behavior, or contingent on an existing switch like 'expand',
or contingent on a new switch?

I favor making it the new default, myself.  I'm thinking of Mike Smith 
and his stylesheets.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>