[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number control?
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number control? |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:53:17 -0400 (EDT) |
(Ted Harding) writes:
>
> I don't think classic troff mm's ":p" has ever been in groff's
> mm, which has used "ft*nr" as long as I've known it (about 1990)!
The obvious "solution" to that "problem" is to add:
.als :p ft*nr
to the mm macros like is done for other obscure number registers. As a
temporary workaround, you could also just add that to your document.
-Larry Jones
What's Santa's definition? How good do you have to be to qualify as good?
-- Calvin
- [Groff] Re: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number control?, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/09/16
- [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number control?, Ted Harding, 2007/09/16
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number control?,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/09/16
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, M Bianchi, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Keith Marshall, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Jon Snader, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/09/17