[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro
From: |
Bob Diertens |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:09:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5i |
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:48:58PM +0200, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > Well, there's specifying a second argument to the FD macro
> > which causes the footnote counter to get reset at each
> > first-level heading, but that appears to be just as
> > undocumented.
>
> >From HP's "Text Formatting User's Guide" (ca. 1991):
>
> If the second argument is specified, automatically-numbered
> footnotes begin again with 1 whenever a first-level heading
> is encountered. This is most useful with the "section-page"
> page numbering scheme. As an example, the input line
>
> .FD "" 1
>
> maintains the default formatting style and causes footnotes
> to be numbered afresh after each first-level heading in a
> document.
This was already there in the "PWB/MM Programmer's Workbench Memorandom
Macros", D.W. Smith and J.R. Mashey, October 1977.
So there only a bug in the groff_mm manual page.
The same document also mentions the names used by PWB/MM in the chapter
"Extending and Modifying the Macros":
registers: Aa (most common, accessible to users)
An (common, accessible to user)
A (accessible, set on command line)
:x (mostly internal, rarely accessiblem usually dedicated)
;x (internal, dynamic, temporaries)
Seen this, I suggest not to provide aliases for registers :x.
This only clutters up the name-space for registers.
Gr,
Bob
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/09/16
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, M Bianchi, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Keith Marshall, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Jon Snader, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Ralph Corderoy, 2007/09/18
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Larry Jones, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Luke Kendall, 2007/09/18
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2007/09/19
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro,
Bob Diertens <=
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, M Bianchi, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, M Bianchi, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Clarke Echols, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, M Bianchi, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Luke Kendall, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, M Bianchi, 2007/09/17