[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes? |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:31:01 +0100 (CET) |
> What I mean is that I'd like to be able to do something like this:
>
> For more information, see the \n[troff]Description\n[troff]
> \n[nroff]DESCRIPTION\n[nroff] section.
There are no inline conditionals in groff. You would rather define a
macro like this:
.de t-or-n
. ie t \
. nop \\$1
. el \
. nop \\$2
..
Then you can say
For more information, see the
.t-or-n Description DESCRIPTION
section.
Werner
- [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?, Michael(tm) Smith, 2008/02/23
- Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?, Michael(tm) Smith, 2008/02/23
- Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?, Michael(tm) Smith, 2008/02/25
- Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?, Clarke Echols, 2008/02/25
- Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?, Michael(tm) Smith, 2008/02/26
- Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?, Clarke Echols, 2008/02/26
- Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?, Steve Izma, 2008/02/26
- Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?, Michael(tm) Smith, 2008/02/27
- Re: [Groff] nroff vs. troff conditional using escapes?, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/02/26