[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Handling '...'
From: |
Tadziu Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Handling '...' |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:53:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
> Using .\|.\|. is too "spread out", but the \^ space looks very nice,
> and is much simpler.
>> Note that the effect depends on the font. In particular, in a
>> fixed-width font (like Courier Roman, \f[CR]), your "..." will
>> come out with each dot spaced on by the fixed width of a character,
>> and will look bad. In that case moving the dots closer together,
>> as in
>>
>> .char \[el] .\h'-0.25n'.\h'-0.25n'.
>>
>> would produce a better result.
I beg to differ. There is a general tendency these days to set
the ellipsis way to tight (such as in the predefined "ellipsis"
character in most fonts). Therefore: in a monospaced font such
as Courier, use "..." without negative space. In a proportional
font such as Times, use a full space between dots: ".\~.\~."
(even "\|" is too tight, let alone "\^").
Take a look at some paperback novels from a few years back.
They always use a loosely spaced ellipsis with full spaces.
- [Groff] Handling '...', smoore, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Groff] Handling '...', Keith Marshall, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Groff] Handling '...', Ted Harding, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Groff] Handling '...', Clarke Echols, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Groff] Handling '...',
Tadziu Hoffmann <=
- Re: [Groff] Handling '...', Peter Schaffter, 2009/06/22
- Re: [Groff] Handling '...', Clarke Echols, 2009/06/22
- Re: [Groff] Handling '...', Tadziu Hoffmann, 2009/06/22
- Re: [Groff] Handling '...', Mike Bianchi, 2009/06/22
- Re: [Groff] Handling '...', Ted Harding, 2009/06/22