[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] groff on Intel platform
From: |
Miklos Somogyi |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] groff on Intel platform |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:22:27 +1100 |
On 15/01/2010, at 09:21 PM, joerg van den hoff wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:48:48 +0100, Miklos Somogyi <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 14/01/2010, at 08:31 PM, Patrik Schindler wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Miklos,
>>>
>>> Am 14.01.2010 um 07:57 schrieb Miklos Somogyi:
>>>
>>>> My questions are: 1) Is there an intel version of groff at all?
>>>
>>>
>>> Groff has been with OS X at least since I use it (10.2) and it's still with
>>> 10.6, 1.19.2.
>>>
>>
>> Good to hear that if I go the distance, I will not be disappointed with PPC
>> versions.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> 2) Anyone who went through of getting unix stuff and X under Snow any
>>>> advice please?
>
> as already noted by patrik schindler, groff should be there (in /usr/bin)
> anyway
> in a fresh 10.6 install. what makes you believe it's not there?
>
I did a few "file" there and all of them were ppc, so next I did "file * | grep
-L" and it showed nothing.
Now that you mentinoned groff as not ppc, I found that I used the wrong option,
"-L" instead of "-v".
That showed up a lot of non-ppc program. I've found groff but unfortunately gs
was not there.
I hope that unlike its ppc cousin eqn will work here.
> one remote possibility: if you came from 10.4 to 10.6: I believe upt to and
> including 10.4
> `tcsh' was the default shell in the macos `Terminal'. nowadays its `bash'. if
> you've had configured
> your `tcsh' path to find your own `groff' executable (whereever that is on
> your machine) it might be
> that this location no longer is on the `bash' search path.
>
> concerning migration from ppc to intel: there's a compatibility mode allowing
> to use
> your ppc binaries with the intel machine but it's better to
> recompile/re-install native binaries
> (which execute faster significantly).
>
> concerning 'unix stuff': I'm usually (not always) quite content using the
> Macports package management
> system (e.g. for installing `gs' and `gv', as you mentioned them.)
>
I havent heard of Macports, I'l google for it 'cause I need gs badly.
> concerning X: as used to be the case in the past, it's on the macos install
> DVD under 'additional software' (or
> a similar title). I believe it's still not installed by default.
>
> joerg
>
>
I haven't used the install DVD, Migration Assistant did the job on ethernet. I
downloaded Xcode32 developer
stuff from Apple, but I haven't looked at it yet. I am a bit confused when
people talk about X, do they mean
Xcode or something much less.
I also downloaded gfortran but it complain about the lack of "as", perhaps an
assembler?
Well, tonight I try to put my groff house in order.
Thank you for your post,
Miklos
>>>
>>>
>>> What exactly do you need/miss? There's groff, there's GNU textutils and
>>> there's vim. What else do you need? :-)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> e.g. g77, gs, gv, and some supporting X needed too.
>>
>>> :wq! PoC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [Groff] groff on Intel platform, Larry Kollar, 2010/01/16