[Groff] Re: Problem with devtag macros?

[Anton Shepelev]

Werner Lemberg:

> > > I  don't  think so.  .DEVTAG-EO-H is very low-
> > > level (and since of its beta  nature,  neither
> > > .tag  nor .taga are documented at all); it's a
> > > bad idea IMHO to  hardcode  any  typographical
> > > behaviour with it.
> >
> > I  still cannot agree with it, because the modi-
> > fication in question is the removal of  a  side-
> > effect, not the addition of new behaviour.
>
> OK, let's fix this as you suggest.

Attached  is  a patch for devtag.tmac. I wasn't sure
about the naming of strings intended for  local  use
(tag-request)  and of the macro (TAG). The patch for
m.tmac was attached to my previous massage,  so  use
what you think is better.

Anton

devtag.tmac.diff
Description: Binary data