Re: [Groff] EQN documentation

[Ralph Corderoy]

Hi,

Werner wrote:
> Unfortunately, merging doesn't work due to licensing issues (except
> there is stuff in the public domain).  You can use the original paper
> as a starting point, but it must be reformulated.

Personally, I find Kernighan's writing in particular to generally be
terse, clear, and complete.  Any "re-write" or reformulating might find
it hard to keep to his high standard.

Cheers,
Ralph.