Re: [Groff] gropdf and pdfroff

[Anton Shepelev]

Ingo Schwarze:

> > From my own experince, the existing packages are
> > much stronger coupled with Groff and  cannot  be
> > used without good understanding of Groff itself.
> > I didn't try mom though.
>
> Maybe you didn't try mdoc(7),  either  -  or  only
> considered  general  purpose packages in this con-
> text.

Yes, indeed. Thanks for pointing it out  --  I  will
sure  look  into  mdoc, starting from the parsing of
non-positional parameters and options.

Anton