[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX |
Date: |
Fri, 04 May 2012 12:33:32 +0100 |
Hi Ted,
> On that basis, I think (though I may have misunderstood the
> distinction Eric Raymond want to make between presentation-markup and
> structural-markup) that it comes to much the same thing!
The valid distinction seems to be that DocBook gives a tree structure to
the mark-up which troff does not. A tree structure could be inferred
from knowledge of the macros meaning for a particular macro set but the
mark-up itself doesn't create one. (See vi's `:set paragraphs?'.)
Having a tree structure allows one to do wholesale modifications, e.g.
move a branch AKA paragraph.
That said, I much prefer troff's quiet mark-up than the unworkable noise
of DocBook.
Cheers, Ralph.
- [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Anton Shepelev, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Eric S. Raymond, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Meg McRoberts, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Clarke Echols, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Meg McRoberts, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Clarke Echols, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Steve Izma, 2012/05/05
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, James K. Lowden, 2012/05/07
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Steve Izma, 2012/05/08
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Pierre-Jean, 2012/05/08
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, James K. Lowden, 2012/05/09