[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX |
Date: |
Wed, 9 May 2012 01:25:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
>
> > groff to XML to HTML via doclifter produces better HTML than any of
> > the direct groff -> HTML tools.
>
> Sadly, this is true. grohtml would need a big hug with much love to
> grow up, but currently nobody really takes care of it.
The problem is fundamental - a good conversion needs structural
analysis as good as doclifter's, which is *hard*.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Steve Izma, 2012/05/05
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, James K. Lowden, 2012/05/07
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Steve Izma, 2012/05/08
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Pierre-Jean, 2012/05/08
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, James K. Lowden, 2012/05/09
Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, James K. Lowden, 2012/05/03
Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Larry Kollar, 2012/05/08
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Peter Schaffter, 2012/05/09
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Eric S. Raymond, 2012/05/09
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/05/09
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/05/09
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, James K. Lowden, 2012/05/09
- Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/05/10