Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL

[Colin Watson]

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:41:45AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
> Am 25.01.2013 00:52, schrieb Colin Watson:
> > At present, I see no need to rock the boat by changing anything; the
> > dual-licensing of documentation files seems adequate.
> 
> NTL, for some people that is an issue and i am not a friend of double 
> licensing
> because that may cause complication.

I think this is FUD, quite honestly; I see no reason why dual-licensing
causes any particular complication if the copyright holders are happy
with releasing under either of those licences.  As a downstream you can
essentially ignore it and pick either one if you prefer.

-- 
Colin Watson                                       address@hidden