[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:00:01 +0000 |
Hi Tadziu,
> I remember reading somewhere that comments are unnecessary because the
> code is "obvious":
I think there's an underlying truth here. I strive to have the code be
obvious through clarity of structure and identifiers that stress their
purpose and would much rather spend time editing to improve that than
add a comment. Even if sitting there trying to think of a better name
can be hard. It's a bit like the BUGS section in man pages; IIRC they
found fixing a shortcoming was less tedious than documenting it.
Non-local type definitions and variables I tend to comment though;
typically how the values are to be interpreted.
> www.usm.uni-muenchen.de/~hoffmann/roff/tmp/rpdup.pdf
I enjoyed reading that for the first time in quite a few years.
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, Dale Snell, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, Mike Bianchi, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, Mike Bianchi, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, Ted Harding, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/10/27
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, Ted Harding, 2013/10/27
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation, Clarke Echols, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Groff] Multiple Lines Equation,
Ralph Corderoy <=