[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] \[-+] not available? why?
From: |
Ted Harding |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] \[-+] not available? why? |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jul 2014 18:47:46 +0100 (BST) |
On 31-Jul-2014 16:53:08 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to make .char \[-+] ... something that is part of
>> the S font by default?
>
> No. However, it might be added to the constructed symbols provided
> for -Tps (in file `tmac/ps.tmac', using `.fchar').
>
> Werner
That is probably a good idea, since it is a symbol of general interest
(even if not frequently occurring).
However, for it to be appropriately available for equations, one
also needs to have
define -+ "\[-+]"
say in file tmac/eqnrc. If tmac/eqnrc is read in before tmac/ps.tmac
(which I'm not sure about) then one may get a
"warning: can't find special character `-+'"
since \[-+] is not yet defined; but it seems that this will not
spoil the interpretation of "-+" within equations in the troff
source file once tmac/ps.tmac has been read.
As a bit of general advice, it can be very useful to create one's
own special definitions. In my case this has involved extensive
modifications of tmac/eqnrc, plus extra tmac files "tmac/tmac.ted"
and "tmac/tmac.preted" which have a lot of stuff (and involve extra
options "-mpreted -mted" in the command that calls troff.
(I will spare the list the details of this lot ... ).
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
-------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <address@hidden>
Date: 31-Jul-2014 Time: 18:47:42
This message was sent by XFMail
-------------------------------------------------
- Re: [Groff] \[-+] not available? why?, (continued)
Re: [Groff] \[-+] not available? why?, Carsten Kunze, 2014/07/29
Re: [Groff] \[-+] not available? why?, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/07/29
Re: [Groff] \[-+] not available? why?, Denis M. Wilson, 2014/07/30