[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug)
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug) |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:29:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.7.8-70-g9310369 |
Ralph Corderoy <address@hidden> wrote:
|> (For the list: mawk(1) requires a fflush("") in order to "getline <
|> NAME" a file NAME that has been written via "print >> NAME" before,
|> even though fflush("") is not standard and i cannot imagine a
|> situation where an awk(1) script would not like to see a fflush("") on
|> NAME before it starts a getline.)
|
|Can you not close() NAME after writing to it before re-opening it for
|getline? From mawk(1):
|
| Close is used to reread a file or command,
Bummer. Never used close(), never seen it. Didn't try yet, but
it'll surely fix the problem with mawk(1).
Thanks Ralph. (Poor Thomas Dickey, excuse me, excuse me.)
--steffen
- [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/08
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Werner LEMBERG, 2014/11/08
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Ingo Schwarze, 2014/11/08
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/10
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Ingo Schwarze, 2014/11/10
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/11
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Ralph Corderoy, 2014/11/11
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug),
Steffen Nurpmeso <=
- Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/11
Re: [Groff] mdoc(7) interpretation differences (maybe groff bug), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/10