[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons
From: |
Carsten Kunze |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:49:18 +0100 (CET) |
Tadziu Hoffmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> Unfortunately, this also means inventing a new syntax.
> How should "\*", "\(", and "\[" be treated -- as groff
> escapes or as regular-expression magic?
A regex pattern containing variables is questionable. The pattern should be
literal (i.e. it is clear by the syntax that for that string no variables are
interpolated). Then it could have e.g. (the comfortable) Perl regex syntax.
Carsten
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/11/14
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, Carsten Kunze, 2014/11/14
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/11/14
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, Carsten Kunze, 2014/11/14
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/14
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, Carsten Kunze, 2014/11/14
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/11/14
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, Carsten Kunze, 2014/11/14
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons,
Carsten Kunze <=
- Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, hohe72, 2014/11/15
Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, hohe72, 2014/11/23
Re: [Groff] condition: OR of two string comparisons, Carsten Kunze, 2014/11/19