Re: [Groff] Strange error messages from Groff 1.22.3

[Keith Marshall]

On 20/11/14 18:47, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> Sorry for the delayed answer.  Your patch looks fine, and I'm going
>>> to apply it soon.  Thanks a lot.
>>
>> Great, thanks.  Now I can publish the binary with that patch and
>> claim that it was accepted upstream.
> 
> Now committed, with minor fixes.

Thanks, Werner; and thanks also to Eli, for maintaining what is
effectively a MinGW port of groff.

Out of curiosity, Eli, why did you find it necessary to move
stringclass.h to an earlier position in the include order?  Is it not a
symptom of either a flawed design, or an implementation fault, if that
matters?  Is there a MinGW issue which may need investigation?  Or is it
simply that you've introduced a dependency on stringclass.h within
lib.h?  (In which case, would it not have been better to have lib.h
itself include stringclass.h?)

-- 
Regards,
Keith.