[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Proper Small Caps.
From: |
Doug McIlroy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Proper Small Caps. |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:44:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 |
> I am very interested in your opinion on what is best, given the trade off
> between how many days to keep, how many to do each day (6, I think) and how
> much space there is on the drive.
I wonder whether it would be practical to gradually thin nbackup coverage
going back in time, to make older files available without taking up
more storage. A natural thing to do would be to coalesce groups of adjacent
dumps when they get to a certain age, keeping just one version of each file
that changed more than once.
I find from poking around that each dump covers somewhat more
than 24 hours, so there is a lot of duplication to profit from.
I don't know, though, how storage is allocated for dumps. That
could make it hard to recycle storage for thinning. And of
course thinning would take time, too.
Incidentally, the reason I stumbled on the 7-day limit is
that I left some untested code changes just before a 10-day
vacation, and they were wrong. Questionable practice not to
keep a working copy. Will I every learn?
Doug
Re: [Groff] Proper Small Caps.,
Doug McIlroy <=