[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:04:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.8.6-171-gc05ee4b |
Steve Izma <address@hidden> wrote:
|On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:25:50PM -0400, Larry Kollar wrote:
|> Subject: Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform
|>> I'm wondering how CPU configurations affect groff processing
|>> speed.
|I guess I need to re-state the question. I'm quite familiar with
|groff's speed, including with 1000-page (or larger) complex
|books. But I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if groff benefits
|from running on multiple CPU cores and multiple CPUs.
Well i guess that you benefit quite a bit due to the piped nature
in between all the several programs that are involved, right?
Unless one part of the pipeline has to wait for more input from
its predecessor it seems to me they can run in full parallel.
One more reason not to like grohtml, by the way. ^_^
--steffen
- [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Steve Izma, 2016/03/20
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Damian McGuckin, 2016/03/20
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Larry Kollar, 2016/03/23
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Steve Izma, 2016/03/23
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Clarke Echols, 2016/03/23
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/03/24
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, Morten Bo Johansen, 2016/03/24
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform,
Steffen Nurpmeso <=
- Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform, James K. Lowden, 2016/03/24