|
From: | Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: | Re: [Groff] grohtml missing in groff 1.22? |
Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:04:56 +0100 |
Hi Gaius, > multiple preprocessing via soelim is fine - a no-op. Good point. Though failed .so, e.g. `.so missing-file', are passed through to the output and could in theory do something different on a second pass. ;-) Cheers, Ralph.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |