[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page! |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Dec 2016 09:39:35 +0100 (CET) |
> the problem with this sentence is, that not everyone understands it
> as a joke. Some may think it is meant literally and then wonder how
> one can write this into a professional documentation. If all agree
> that this sentence should be kept--okay, but there is a risk that
> from time to time one may get upset when reading it and getting it
> wrong.
You might enjoy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_entry
which is something similar: funny entries in completely serious
encyclopedies and the like.
Werner
- Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!, Carsten Kunze, 2016/12/30
- Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/30
- Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!, Robert Thorsby, 2016/12/30
- Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!, Ted Harding, 2016/12/30
- Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/12/30
- Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!, Peter Schaffter, 2016/12/31
- Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2016/12/31
- Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!, Carsten Kunze, 2016/12/31
- Re: [Groff] Inappropriate info page!,
Werner LEMBERG <=