[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] [UTROFF] conclusion
From: |
Gour |
Subject: |
Re: [groff] [UTROFF] conclusion |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:26:34 +0100 |
On Tue, 05 Dec 2017 17:54:02 +0100
Pierre-Jean <address@hidden> wrote:
> Mom is a macro set, while Troff/Heirloom is the interpreter of the
> macro set, so, we can't compare things like this.
I stand corrected for not being explicit enough.
> A proper comparision would be between Groff, Heirloom Troff, and
> Neatroff on one side, and Mom, Utmac, ms, me, on the other side.
Well, I meant that.
> 2) With some hacks if not out of the box, Mom probably works well
> enough on Neatroff to take advantage of its features.
Hmm, that's new thing for since I though Mom could work only with Groff
since e.g. having paragrpah-based aligning instead of line one etc.
would be terrific to have along with Mom macros.
> All those things considered the couple groff/mom is a very solid
> choice.
OK. Thanks a lot for elaborate answer.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Even a man of knowledge acts according to his own nature, for
everyone follows the nature he has acquired from the three modes.
What can repression accomplish?
--
One must deliver himself with the help of his mind, and not
degrade himself. The mind is the friend of the conditioned soul,
and his enemy as well.