[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] [Groff] It is time to modernise "groff"
From: |
Steve Izma |
Subject: |
Re: [groff] [Groff] It is time to modernise "groff" |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:24:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:03:48PM -0500, Dave Kemper wrote:
> Subject: Re: [groff] [Groff] It is time to modernise "groff"
>
> On 9/4/17, G. Branden Robinson <address@hidden> wrote:
> > At 2017-08-31T20:54:10+0000, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> >> p) Remove the '-a' option (the ASCII approximation output).
>
> As one use case, it's important for scripted regression testing.
> Running diffs on PostScript output is often not very illuminating, but
> running it on -a output easily enables you to home in on exactly what
> the typeset difference is between one run and another.
In decades of using groff, I'd never thought of this, but it's
definitely something I'll start to use.
> It also has one very valuable output property: outputting the string
> "<hy>" to represent hyphens that groff has inserted for word breaks,
Also very useful.
> Please do not remove the -a option.
I agree. I think it should stay.
-- Steve
--
Steve Izma
-
Home: 35 Locust St., Kitchener, Ontario, Canada N2H 1W6
E-mail: address@hidden phone: 519-745-1313 cell: 519-998-2684
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style>