[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation? |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Apr 2018 16:11:36 +0100 |
Hi John,
> >
> >
> * *
Any chance you could use an MUA that has a consistent quoting style and
ties In-Reply-To, References, and the bits being quoted together?
Otherwise threading for those of us using it suffers.
I realise it may mean two or three short replies when one summary would
do, but most of the time the extra noise is at an accepted level.
> Somedays I'll write `e-mail`, and other days it just looks like I'm
> subtracting the value of the `mail` variable
Teach your spelling checker right from wrong? :-)
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, (continued)
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, G. Branden Robinson, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Nate Bargmann, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Nate Bargmann, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, James K. Lowden, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, G. Branden Robinson, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/22
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/25
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Steve Izma, 2018/04/25
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Mike Bianchi, 2018/04/25
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/25
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Steve Izma, 2018/04/25
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/26