[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Dec 2019 12:43:48 +0000 |
Hi Ingo,
> > For some version of POSIX. :-)
...
> But POSIX is actually unusually benign in this respect. POSIX 2008 is
> still in force and widely adopted (though of course, many commercial
> UNIXes still implement POSIX 2001, but i doubt that's relevant in the
> present context). In a few years, there will probably be a new POSIX
> standard
Yes, there's the two you mentioned, and various updates to them.
2001
2004 https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/
2008 https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2008edition/
2013 https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2013edition/
2016 https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2016edition/
2017 https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2018edition/ [sic]
Anyone here know how much modern-day groff is compiled on old-POSIX
systems?
--
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, (continued)
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/31
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/12/31
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/31
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, G. Branden Robinson, 2019/12/30
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/31
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/31
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, John Gardner, 2019/12/31
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: GNUism in groff tests, was: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/31
- Re: pic anomalies, Ingo Schwarze, 2019/12/30
- Re: pic anomalies, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/12/30
- Re: pic anomalies, Colin Watson, 2019/12/30
Re: pic anomalies, Doug McIlroy, 2019/12/31