[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUism in groff tests
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: GNUism in groff tests |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:56:08 +1100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
At 2019-12-31T13:59:26+0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> You are right, i didn't realize "X$" is an old idiom from per-POSIX
> times and not needed with POSIX shells.
No worries. I hope I didn't come across too harshly; the construction
makes my eyes bleed. :-O
> I did not commit these yet such that we can make up our mind
> how to best fix them.
>
> I admit <() is elegant, but unfortunately non-portable.
Yeah. I'll try to avoid using it everywhere I can. :P
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: GNUism in groff tests,
G. Branden Robinson <=