[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: groff/Heirloom difference: break in diversion trap
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: groff/Heirloom difference: break in diversion trap |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Nov 2020 01:46:18 +1100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
At 2020-11-21T15:04:06+0100, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
> You should replay diversions in no-fill mode (.nf), otherwise
> whitespace will be reformatted *again* (which you usually don't
> want, since diversions contain already-formatted material).
Yuuuup. Ding ding ding. A couple of qualifiers in CSTR #54, ยง7, and
stuff I've already edited(!) in our Texinfo manual (.asciify, .unformat)
makes several times more sense now.
And yes, when I add ".nf" before ".DI" in my examples, Heirloom and
groff behave the same in this area.[1]
Thanks, Tadziu. Sometimes I peer at tree bark so closely looking for
termite holes that I forget than I'm in a forest. :)
Regards,
Branden
[1] They still differ in hyphenation points and the precise value of the
.t register, but those don't alarm me.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature