[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3-word compound adjectives; the return of the '-'
From: |
Tadziu Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: 3-word compound adjectives; the return of the '-' |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2022 19:03:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) |
> a) block device-based filesystems
> b) block-device-based filesystems
> c) block- device-based filesystems
> d) block device\[en]based filesystems
>
> Which form would you recommend me to use?
I would go with "block-device\[en]based filesystems", with
the reasoning that a dash binds stronger than a space, the
precedence being (from stronger to weaker binding):
[none] > hyphen > en-dash > space
Similarly:
hot-fudge sundae
and
Einstein\[en]de-Sitter universe
even though other people may disagree on this point.
(de Sitter as a name is without hyphen, but I would
hyphenate it in a compound to make the relationship
between the words clearer.)
On the web and in the literature you can find
Anti-de Sitter space
which I would prefer to see as
Anti\[en]de-Sitter space
Although language does not always follow logic, in reference
manuals and the like exactness should be preferred over
traditional custom. This also pertains to moving punctuation
outside of quotes, if it is not part of the quoted text, e.g.,
This is referred to as a "file system".
instead of
This is referred to as a "file system."