[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: groff 1.23.0.rc2 status report (was: [BUG] gropdf, tbl: Completely b
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: groff 1.23.0.rc2 status report (was: [BUG] gropdf, tbl: Completely broken table) |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2022 10:51:03 -0600 |
[self-follow-up to clarify two points]
At 2022-12-18T23:32:51-0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I plan to fiddle various groff mdoc(7) internal register settings so
> that Courier is only used with ".Bd -literal" and ".Bd -literal".
Brainfart here. I was thinking of ".Bd -literal" and ".Dl".
I observe that the list-begin macro (`Bl`) lacks a "-literal" option, I
suppose because without further parameterization there would be
ambiguity whether the typeface applied to literals should apply to the
definiendum, the definiens,[1] or both. (If both, you don't need the
option; use one of the other macros above.)
> Probably not a lot of this will be visible to terminal-only users.
I will add that it's possible that some of the problems with the
groff_mdoc(7) page can be overcome with better use of the package's own
macros. I would have assumed that the page was written in the first
place by an mdoc(7) expert, but I no longer have confidence in that
assumption.[2] Some time ago Ingo Schwarze made some suggestions
regarding macro selection when I was making a small change to the page,
and while I did not understand his advice in detail at the time, I now
do, and agree with it. It's a shame when a document about documentation
is deficient as an exemplar of its own subject.
Regards,
Branden
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition#Basic_terminology
[2] It originates in the mdoc.samples document from the BSD Net-2
release. Perhaps this was not written by Livingston (who authored
the package) but by someone else.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [BUG] gropdf, tbl: Completely broken table (was: Ping^1: Chapters of the manual (was: Bug#1018737: ...)), (continued)
- Re: [BUG] gropdf, tbl: Completely broken table (was: Ping^1: Chapters of the manual (was: Bug#1018737: ...)), Deri, 2022/12/17
- Re: [BUG] gropdf, tbl: Completely broken table, Ralph Corderoy, 2022/12/18
- Re: [BUG] gropdf, tbl: Completely broken table (was: Ping^1: Chapters of the manual (was: Bug#1018737: ...)), Alejandro Colomar, 2022/12/18
- Re: groff 1.23.0.rc2 status report (was: [BUG] gropdf, tbl: Completely broken table), Deri, 2022/12/19
- Re: groff 1.23.0.rc2 status report (was: [BUG] gropdf, tbl: Completely broken table), Alejandro Colomar, 2022/12/19
- Re: groff 1.23.0.rc2 status report (was: [BUG] gropdf, tbl: Completely broken table),
G. Branden Robinson <=