[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] 02/14: [man]: Warn on bad MT/ME/UR/UE nesting.
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: [groff] 02/14: [man]: Warn on bad MT/ME/UR/UE nesting. |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:58:58 -0600 |
Hi Deri,
At 2024-01-30T14:51:36+0000, Deri wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 January 2024 02:13:47 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [man]: Warn on bad MT/ME/UR/UE nesting.
> >
> > * tmac/an.tmac (MT, ME, UR, UE): Throw warnings on bad nesting.
>
> This causes a warning when viewing groff_out(5), because it has a
> nested .UR within a .TP.
I'm aware of it. :)
> Seems to work, in this instance, but perhaps there is a better way.
The better way would be a resolution of Savannah #64134.[1]
You have have noticed that I've been giving fresh attention to how groff
man(7) handles the diversions it creates.
I've kept the "bad" page structure intact to make it really easy to tell
when I've solved the nested diversion problem. My working copy has had
some "solutions", but they throw off line adjustment and look ugly. I
think at this point it's simply a matter of whacking away at the problem
with careful attention to environmental issues. I feel close. If I get
unbearably stuck, I'll change the page to avoid the warnings.
Thank you for landing the changes that bring hyperlinks to life in
man(7) for PDF! That was the immediate cause of me digging into the
aforementioned ticket.
Regards,
Branden
[1] https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?61434
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature