[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:17:41 -0500 |
[self-follow-up; dropping Russ from CC because it's a pretty obscure
point of *roff semantics]
At 2024-03-17T15:52:55-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [6] I've marked `SB` as deprecated in the forthcoming groff 1.24; it
> does nothing that modern formatters can't achieve by combining `SM`
> and `B`. I suspect Sun created it because the `it` *roff request
> behaved inconsistently with other requests that took a line count as
> an argument, like `ce` and `ul`, ignoring the `\c` escape sequence
> as the latter two did not. (Skeptics may feel free to play with the
> attachment, and to guess where I've tried it out.) That in turn is
> why GNU troff has an `itc` request. Or such is my reconstruction of
> past developers' decisions based purely on parsimony and measurable
> program behavior, assuming rational decision making.
A person can set their watch by my forgetting the attachment.
This time for sure.
Regards,
Branden
ce-it-ul-and-backslash-c.roff
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP, (continued)
- Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP, Russ Allbery, 2024/03/15
- Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP, G. Branden Robinson, 2024/03/15
- Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP, Russ Allbery, 2024/03/15
- Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP, G. Branden Robinson, 2024/03/15
- Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP, G. Branden Robinson, 2024/03/15
Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP, Russ Allbery, 2024/03/16
Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP, Frederic Chartier, 2024/03/18
Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP,
G. Branden Robinson <=
Re: groff now undoing .ad settings after .IP, Dave Kemper, 2024/03/19