[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposed v2: revised man(7) synopsis macros
From: |
Alejandro Colomar |
Subject: |
Re: Proposed v2: revised man(7) synopsis macros |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:32:06 +0200 |
Hi Branden,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:59:58AM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Difference from v1
> ==================
> Support reuse of previously computed indentation, to line up function
> arguments and similar across multiple synopses. Requested by Alex
> Colomar.
>
> Proposal
> ========
>
> I have been dissatisfied with groff man(7)'s SY and YS macros for a long
> time. My primary grievance is one that has frustrated its uptake by
> documenters of libraries: the macros are designed for synopsizing Unix
> commands, not C library functions.
>
> After working on the ncurses man pages for a while it became clear to me
> how to modestly revise the way groff man(7)'s SY and YS macros work to
> serve both sets of authors better.
>
> My proposal, as a diff to groff Git HEAD, is attached.
[...]
> Attachments:
>
> * "git diff" of my working copy, also including updates to existing
> groff man pages and to a regression test script, to reflect the new
> `SY` and `YS` behavior.
> * Sample document exercising mandoc(1)'s incorrect handling of
> `in` and `ti` requests.
> * An example document, renderable with groff Git HEAD, 1.23.0, 1.22.4,
> and 1.22.3 (at least), illustrating use of these macros. View it with
> "nroff -man".
>
> My questions:
>
> A. Does anyone object to me committing this change to groff's master
> branch? It will of course require a NEWS item, which I will write.
Acked-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
> B. Does this look enticing enough to any documenters of C libraries for
> you to adopt it?
This one at least. :-)
> Regards,
> Branden
Have a lovely day!
Alex
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature