[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: savannah
From: |
Marco Gerards |
Subject: |
Re: savannah |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:14:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Vincent Pelletier <address@hidden> writes:
> Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>> And they are still talking about LILO vs. GRUB? Completely off-topic. Who on
>> the earth understands your post? *sigh*
>
> They are asking for a popularity poll between LILO and GRUB.
> And they also report some problems they had with grub legacy :
> -software raid (not straightforward with grub)
This can be easily implemented in GRUB 2 just like I implemented the
"loopback" support. I did not know how software raid worked in GRUB
Legacy (I did not know it had software raid support) and I do not know
if this is the right way to implement it...
> -"lilo -R"-like functionality (what's that ? an automatic fallback when
> kernel can't be read ?) to make remote kernel changes safer.
Something like this is possible with later (the latest?) GRUB Legacy
release AFAIK/
> What comes up is also that most users just keep the default bootloader
> from their distro. And grub seems to be the default bootloader in a
> growing number of distributions.
Right. I think it is our task to make GRUB 2 the default. :)
--
Marco
- savannah, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/08/08
- Re: savannah, Vincent Pelletier, 2005/08/08
- Re: savannah, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/08/08
- Re: savannah, Vincent Pelletier, 2005/08/09
- Re: savannah,
Marco Gerards <=
- Re: savannah, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/08/09
- Re: savannah, Marco Gerards, 2005/08/09
- Re: savannah, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/08/09
- Re: savannah, Marco Gerards, 2005/08/09
- Re: savannah, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/08/10
- Re: savannah, Marco Gerards, 2005/08/11
- Re: savannah, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/08/11