[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL version 3
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: GPL version 3 |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:10:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 09:06:49PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:40:15PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> >
> > So what do you think?
>
> As said in my other mails in this thread, I don't think it makes sense to
> switch to GPLv3 unless we do it all the way, including GRUB Legacy.
>
> (and I'm all for switching rather than staying with GPLv2)
Oh, I'm sorry. I missed the part of your mail that mentions GRUB Legacy
cannot easily migrate to GPLv3 because it uses GPLv2-only code.
In that case, I suggest we keep GRUB Legacy under GPLv2, but also make the
promise that GPLv3 code from GRUB 2 won't be relicensed to GPLv2 for use in
GRUB Legacy, because that makes GPLv3 useless.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is address@hidden Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
- Re: GPL version 3, (continued)
- Re: GPL version 3, Jeroen Dekkers, 2007/07/04
- Re: GPL version 3, Jerone Young, 2007/07/04
- Re: GPL version 3, Stefan Reinauer, 2007/07/04
- Re: GPL version 3, Marco Gerards, 2007/07/05
- Re: GPL version 3, Robert Millan, 2007/07/07
- Re: GPL version 3,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: GPL version 3, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2007/07/14