[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latest kernel shown at last
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: Latest kernel shown at last |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:21:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
On Thursday 28 February 2008 11:41, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 02:10:18AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > >This is on grub2 (1.96+20080203-1ubuntu1) dunno whether its a bug
> > >which should be filed in grub2 here or something which got messed up
> > >while packaging it for ubuntu. Any help/guidance would be nice.
> >
> > Please note that 1 is less than 5. The Debian revision is compared as
> > string, not as number.
> >
> > Correct comparing of Linux versions is very hard. At very least, all
> > sequences of digits should be compared numerically. I don't think GNU
> > sort can do that. And then there is an issue with comparing "-pre",
> > "-rc", "-test", "-mm" and other suffixes. And the separators have
> > different meanings - think of comparing 2.6.24-10 and 2.6.24.2-1.
> >
> > I was thinking of fixing it, but I'm not sure it can even be done in
> > shell script. We may need to write a helper in C just for that, or
> > resort to bashisms.
>
> Okuji doesn't like bash scripts, but I really don't see what's the problem
> with requiring bash just like you could require perl or python. Okuji,
> would you reconsider about this?
What feature of bash do you need to use?
Okuji