[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: GRUB2 and Multiboot?
From: |
Julian Salazar |
Subject: |
RE: GRUB2 and Multiboot? |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:52:03 -0600 |
Sorry if I wasn't more specific, but I was talking about the multiboot draft
at http://grub.enbug.org/MultibootDraft, specifically the Multiboot
Information Format.
> Or maybe you mean that the kernel should tell the bootloader whether the
> control should be passed to it in the 64-bit mode?
Exactly what I mean - maybe there should a flag of some kind, or a
parameter...
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Pavel Roskin
Sent: April-13-08 8:14 PM
To: The development of GRUB 2
Subject: Re: GRUB2 and Multiboot?
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 13:55 -0600, Julian Salazar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got some questions about GRUB2 relating to the Multiboot Draft:
>
> It seems like GRUB2 passes the start tag with a key of 1, bootloader name
> with a key of 2, etc.
> But the Multiboot draft says that the start tag has a key of 0, bootloader
> name has a key of 1, etc.
> Which one is right? One or the other has to be changed...
You may get a better answer if you quote the specification (and where
you found it) and the piece of code that appears wrong to you.
I looked into multiboot.texi in GRUB 1 CVS, and I don't see the word
"tag" there.
> Suggestions:
> I think that the multiboot tags should be explicitly (in the multiboot
spec)
> passed in order (i.e. that a tag with a key of 5 should always go before
one
> with a key of 7) Maybe a bootloader should give an x86-64 kernel the
option
> to either boot it into 32 or 64 bit mode? Or is that asking for too much?
I don't think having a dual-mode kernel would be a good idea. Either it
would be two kernels glued together, or it would be essentially a 32-bit
kernel with option 64-bit extensions - hardly a good idea for a kernel.
And in the later case, it would be better to use a parameter, like
"enable-64bit".
Or maybe you mean that the kernel should tell the bootloader whether the
control should be passed to it in the 64-bit mode?
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel