[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grub-probe gets a segfault
From: |
Isaac M. Marcos |
Subject: |
Re: grub-probe gets a segfault |
Date: |
Wed, 21 May 2008 20:20:54 -0430 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
El Friday 16 May 2008 13:32:40 Pavel Roskin escribió:
> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 13:18 +0000, Isaac Marcos wrote:
> > The fix would be to reject RAID partitions in
> > grub_lvm_scan_device().
> > The only validity check in that function is presence of the
> > LVM label in
> > the first 4 sectors. Perhaps additional checks are needed.
> >
> > Good find Pavel. :-)
> >
> > Just a question, /dev/sda5 has an equivalent setup:
> > # pvck /dev/sda5
> > Device /dev/sda5 not found (or ignored by filtering).
> > /dev/sda5 232 3396 25422831 fd Linux raid
> > autodetect
> >
> > Why grub-probe doesn't fail on /dev/sda5?
>
> I think because it has no LVM label. Maybe /dev/sda6 was holding a LVM
> physical volume before, and the label was not erased when it became a
> RAID partition.
I cheked, and both partitions (sda5,sda6) have LVM labels, and correctly so:
/dev/sda5 (for example):
0000:0200 LABELONE........?ÍÉC ...LVM2 001npzaBI7ZXIhG29Uxcg1lkUIlTNTS6wbR
0000:0240 .../.............................................ð..............
sda5,sdb5,sdc5,sdd5 form a RAID5 disk (md1) ON which LVM was set up.
sda6,sdb6,sdc6,sdd6 form a RAID5 disk (md2) ON which LVM was set up.
pvck /dev/md1
Found label on /dev/md1, sector 1, type=LVM2 001
Found text metadata area: offset=4096, size=192512
pvck /dev/md2
Found label on /dev/md2, sector 1, type=LVM2 001
Found text metadata area: offset=4096, size=192512
Some kind of deep interaction is going on?
> As you can see, pvck doesn't display information partition. It means it
> cannot be fooled by the label. And that's what GRUB should do.
Yes, but in the meanwhile :
Today, I bump on this problem again on updating kernel. Because of this fault,
update-initramfs reports a failure. It can't find "/".
grub-probe -t device / --> segfault!!
Let me explain something:
Neither "/" or "/boot" has anything to do with RAID or LVM in this system. It
was setup like this exactly to prevent this kind of interferences on boot.
They are "/dev/sda1" and "/dev/sda2", plain ext3 partitions.
And here comes grub-probe, testing every disk and partition on the system,
testing for LVM, and many other things, and failing in the process.
I think it boils down to this main idea:
Could it test simple partitions first and if / is found, stop scanning?
Why it needs to scan anything else if the requested partition has been found?
--
Isaac M. Marcos
GPG key 0xC9045C1B
5633 ECAF 44B1 8A5D 9371 DCDA 4620 A016 C904 5C1B
The only place success comes before work is in the dictionary.
VINCE LOMBARDI
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, (continued)
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Pavel Roskin, 2008/05/08
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Isaac M. Marcos, 2008/05/08
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Pavel Roskin, 2008/05/08
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Robert Millan, 2008/05/09
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Isaac M. Marcos, 2008/05/09
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Pavel Roskin, 2008/05/09
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Isaac M. Marcos, 2008/05/12
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Pavel Roskin, 2008/05/15
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Isaac Marcos, 2008/05/16
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Pavel Roskin, 2008/05/16
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault,
Isaac M. Marcos <=
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Pavel Roskin, 2008/05/21
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Pavel Roskin, 2008/05/22
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Isaac M. Marcos, 2008/05/23
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Pavel Roskin, 2008/05/27
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Robert Millan, 2008/05/28
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Isaac M. Marcos, 2008/05/28
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Pavel Roskin, 2008/05/29
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Isaac M. Marcos, 2008/05/12
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Jeff Chua, 2008/05/20
- Re: grub-probe gets a segfault, Pavel Roskin, 2008/05/20