[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Endianness macros capitalization
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: Endianness macros capitalization |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:33:10 -0400 |
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 15:21 +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
> Very nice optimization idea!
>
> The practical advantage is probably limited by the fact that kernel.img
> and most of the modules typically included in a i386-pc core.img are not
> affected.
>
> I attached a diff of "size *.mod" outputs for the test mentioned in my
> last mail. '-' original code, '+' grub_swap_*() replaced by dummies.
> Large savings potential is in afs.mod, hfs*.mod, and xfs.mod.
...
> - 4980 40 16 5036 13ac xfs.mod
> + 2924 40 16 2980 ba4 xfs.mod
It is a big deal for xfs users. Even more so for gpt+raid+lvm+xfs
users, who are against the wall :-)
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, (continued)
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Christian Franke, 2008/07/08
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/09
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Christian Franke, 2008/07/09
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/09
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Christian Franke, 2008/07/10
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/10
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Jordi Mallach, 2008/07/11
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/11
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/11
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Christian Franke, 2008/07/11
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization,
Pavel Roskin <=
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Christian Franke, 2008/07/20
- Re: Endianness macros capitalization, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/20