[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Fix warning in fs/xfs.c
From: |
Marco Gerards |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Fix warning in fs/xfs.c |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:50:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:21 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > ChangeLog:
>> > * fs/xfs.c (struct grub_xfs_dir_header): Use names similar to
>> > those in Linux XFS code. Provide a way to access 64-bit parent
>> > inode.
>> > (grub_xfs_iterate_dir): Use the new names. Avoid reading past
>> > the end of struct grub_xfs_dir_header.
>>
>> *please* do not look at Linux code or whatever *and* contribute to
>> GRUB. It might cause copyright troubles I will have to deal with :-/
>
> I just tried to make names similar without copying any code. But it's a
> useful reminder.
What I meant is that even *looking* at code might cause problems.
People can claim you have stolen their ideas. That would essentially
mean the same as copying code. I just want to avoid such problems at
beforehand.
>> I do not see the advantage of this patch. Can you please explain why
>> we need these name changes?
>
> We were casting a pointer to a 32-bit integer to a pointer to a 64-bit
> integer, which is bad, and gcc was emitting a warning about it.
Right
> Worse yet, the 64-bit value was "sticking" beyond the end the structure
> we were using to describe the header.
>
> i4 and i8 are generally used by Linux XFS code to describe 32-bit and
> 64-bit values if either can be used. The "smallino" field was highly
> misleading because it had to be negated. It's the number of "big" (i8
> or 64-bit) entries. If it's 0, then the entries are "small".
>
> So it was natural to call it "i8count". And once it was "i8count", it
> was natural to call the first value "count".
>
> If you prefer another naming convention, let's rename the entries
> according to it. I was thinking having 2 32-bit integers "parent_hi"
> and "parent_lo" or something like that. Anyway, let's not use
> "smallino" - "bigentries" would be better.
What I suggest is that you pick the names yourself or from a standard,
instead of from Linux code.
--
Marco