|
From: | Pavel Roskin |
Subject: | Re: subversion repository structure |
Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:43:36 -0400 |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.4) |
Quoting "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <address@hidden>:
On Thursday 17 July 2008 21:10:11 Pavel Roskin wrote:Let's take another project and look at it as outsiders to get some perspective. Suppose gcc 5 is rewritten in Haskell. Do we expect it to be in a separate repository?Yes, I do, if it is so different. If something is rewritten from scratch, it is not continuous development but continual one. For example, just like libxml and libxml2.
OK, I presented my arguments. If they are not convincing, so be it. If we cannot use the standard layout, then the current structure is my preference, simply because moving stuff around would make the history more complex and possibly confuse some tools. Anyway, we can live with any repository structure. We just need to document it.
-- Regards, Pavel Roskin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |