[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ATA update
From: |
Felix Zielcke |
Subject: |
Re: ATA update |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:26:35 +0200 |
Hello Marco,
Am Freitag, den 08.08.2008, 11:17 +0200 schrieb Marco Gerards:
> Hi Felix,
>
> Most likely something failed in grub_ata_identify. you might want to
> add more debugging information there.
Ok I try.
> > ls (ata8) shows partition table
> > ls (ata8,1) or (ata8,2) unknown filesystem
>
> Can grub-emu deal with these filesystems?
No it says unknown fs, too.
> > But that's probable right, if your ata.mod works more then Linux instead
> > of the biosdisk.mod which works more then yeah BIOS ;)
>
> Hm?
>
> > I just tried to mount /dev/sda1 which is NTFS and syslog shows $MFT
> > corrupted (ntfs-3g).
>
> Also on biosdisk.
I currently always boot directly from my Raid 0
GRUB + Vista bootmgr + Vista \Windows\ is on Raid 0
my Linux / and so /boot is on my PATA disk.
This works totally fine for booting Vista and Linux.
With biosdisk.mod there's just (hd0) wich are both harddisks for the
raid0
ls (hd0,1)/ shows everything from my NTFS raid0
(hd1) is then my IDE disk.
There's no (hd2)
The BIOS itself can handle the RAID 0 for booting fine.
But as soon as you're in Linux or Windows the OS needs to care about it.
Linux still shows sda and sdb, but that doestn't work right.
I need dmraid so I have one /dev/mapper/nvidia_cediideh1 which I can
mount fine.
This is RAID 0 with chunksize 256 KB, so the first 256 KB of the
combined disks is on disk 0
But NTFS hasn't it's $MFT just on the first 256 KB
The second partition of it is a small ext3, but maybe it just begins on
the second disk.