[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Platform information services
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Platform information services |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:00:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:38:41PM +0200, Javier Martín wrote:
> Yes, but this is a "kernel" design decision that is specified nowhere
> to the modules writers. Thus, this could change tomorrow and the
> scheme would break down.
GRUB is being developed as a whole, which includes kernel and modules. If
we modify the kernel in a way that could break modules, it's part of the
procedure to check modules and make sure they don't break because of this
(although, of course, we could always make mistakes).
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- [RFC] Platform information services, Javier Martín, 2008/08/13
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/08/14
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Javier Martín, 2008/08/14
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Javier Martín, 2008/08/14
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/08/15
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Javier Martín, 2008/08/15
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/08/15
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Javier Martín, 2008/08/15
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/08/15
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Javier Martín, 2008/08/15
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/08/15
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Javier Martín, 2008/08/15
- Re: [RFC] Platform information services, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/08/15